24 hours in AI news
We recorded 3 claims from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 2 can’t be checked. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (3)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Forecast
“Another sign that the bubble may not last forever.”
Our reading: The generative AI investment bubble may not last forever, as signalled by some late-stage VC firms sitting out.
No horizon
Qualifier: based on some late-stage VCs sitting out the GenAI rush
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“In another bit of possible foreshadowing: GenAI is starting to get a tiny bit of Scarlet Letter feel.”
Our reading: Generative AI is starting to get a tiny bit of a 'Scarlet Letter' feel, which he presents as possible foreshadowing.
No horizon
Qualifier: a tiny bit
Assessment: SupportedSaid
Observation
“Tesla FSD is getting better. But is getting enough better?”
Our reading: Tesla FSD is getting better, and he raises the question of whether it is getting enough better.
No horizon Evidence as of
Limitation: The tracker figures in e1 come from crowdsourced, self-reported data. e1 notes that data for later v12.3.x releases still needed weeks to be entered.