Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

“The other problem is that these companies don’t really appear to have a way to cut costs, because inference remains very expensive and training costs are never going away”

Why Are We Still Doing This?, paragraph 54.

Our reading:

Anthropic and OpenAI don't really appear to have a way to cut costs, because inference remains very expensive and training costs are never going away.

Assessment: Can’t be checked

What happened

Not graded on evidence

Outcome: Can’t be checked

An opinion, a recommendation, or too vague to test. Listed, not scored.

Evidence up to . Checked .

Why

Zitron says the companies 'don't really appear to have a way' to cut costs, and that training costs are 'never going away.' The first is a hedged impression. The second has no deadline. Neither names a measure. Grading it would mean adding a cost baseline and threshold he did not give. For context, Anthropic's S-1 shows compute costs rising every quarter in dollars while falling as a share of revenue, which could be read either way.

Caveats

  • Context covers Anthropic only, not OpenAI.

Evidence (1 item)

Claims like this aren’t scored, so there is no evidence to show.

How we judged it

Kind of claim
Causal claim
Deadline
None given. We don’t add one.

Conditions

  • don't really appear to (their words)

Where we had to interpret

  • As the reviewers noted, 'don't really appear to have a way' is an explicitly hedged impression, not a firm claim. 'Never going away' has no time limit and cannot be tested. Turning it into a measurable test would require baselines, thresholds and accounting choices he did not give.
  • It is treated as not checkable.

We don’t grade claims like this. We only check the quote and who said it.

We found 38 claims in this post. See them all.

Full record

Source and dates

Where's Your Ed At, Why Are We Still Doing This?, paragraph 54.

Said
We read the source
live page, full text, public
Evidence up to
Checked

We read this wording on 2026-10-28. The post may have been edited after 2026-03-17.

Where it was said (1)

Said once in the posts we read.

  • : Where's Your Ed At, Why Are We Still Doing This?

    The other problem is that these companies don’t really appear to have a way to cut costs, because inference remains very expensive and training costs are never going away

    Published
    2026-03-17
    We read it
    , live page
    Access
    full text, public

History

Versions

  • Current: Can’t be checked. Evidence up to 2026-10-28.

What happened to this record

  1. PublishedBy us

    Published after both AI reviews and the final check passed.

  2. Held backBy us

    A reviewer said our test wasn’t fair to what was actually said.