“However, OpenAI's costs are likely to increase, because (as the New York Times notes) if this company grows by 300%, it's very likely that the free user base of ChatGPT increases along with it, burdening the company with more costs.”
Our reading, the sentence that was checked:
OpenAI's costs are likely to increase because, if the company grows by 300%, it is very likely that ChatGPT's free user base grows with it and adds costs.
Assessment: Can’t be checked Not checked against evidence
Where and when Ed Zitron wrote it
Where's Your Ed At, OpenAI Is A Bad Business, paragraph 18.
- Said
- Source observed
- live page, full text, public
- Evidence
- Not checkedboth screens found it cannot be checked
- Assessment recorded
- assessment wyea-oai-business-ab7bd2-a1
We recorded 27 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.
The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-28. The source may have been edited after 2024-10-02. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.
What the claim commits to
- Kind
- Forecast
- Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
- None stated. This site does not add one.
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Deadline state on 2026-10-29
- No horizon (the release’s reference date)
Conditions
- if the company grows by 300% (qualifier, stated by the speaker)
- very likely that the free user base increases (qualifier, stated by the speaker)
From the speaker
- if the company grows by 300%
- very likely that the free user base increases
Our interpretation
None added.
This claim is not graded on evidence. The record checks that the words are quoted correctly and attributed to the right person, and that the claim is classified correctly.
Current assessment
Not graded on evidence
Outcome: Can’t be checked
Both AI providers screened this claim on their own and found that public evidence could not settle it. It is recorded and attributed, not scored.
Why it can’t be checked
Both screens gave the same reason:
- Stated as a chance or a possibility, or at medium or low confidence.
- Evidence
- Not checked
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Assessment recorded
- Policy version
- 2026-10-28.7
Rationale
Not checked against evidence. Two independent screens, one from each provider, both found this stated as a chance or a possibility, or at medium or low confidence.
Limitations
None recorded.
Evidence (0 items)
No evidence was searched for. Both screens found that public evidence could not settle this claim.
Where it was said (1)
Said once in the sources this register covers.
: Where's Your Ed At, OpenAI Is A Bad Business
However, OpenAI's costs are likely to increase, because (as the New York Times notes) if this company grows by 300%, it's very likely that the free user base of ChatGPT increases along with it, burdening the company with more costs.
- Where
- paragraph 18
- Published
- 2024-10-02
- Source observed
- , live page
- Access
- full text, public
History
Assessment versions
- Assessment wyea-oai-business-ab7bd2-a1: Current. Outcome: Can’t be checked. Not checked against evidence. Public date not recorded.
Recorded events
Assessment publishedBy this site
First assessment published after both reviews and the final-text check passed.