Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

“Are AI coding environments making people faster? I don't think so!”

How To Argue With An AI Booster, paragraph 400.

Our reading:

In his view, AI coding environments do not make people faster.

Assessment: Can’t be checked

What happened

Not graded on evidence

Outcome: Can’t be checked

An opinion, a recommendation, or too vague to test. Listed, not scored.

Evidence up to . Checked .

Why

He asks a question and answers with an opinion: "I don't think so!" He backs it with a study that "suggested" a slowdown. That study is real: METR's July 2025 trial found experienced open-source developers took 19% longer with early-2025 AI tools, which METR called a snapshot of one setting. But he names no group of users, no tools, no period, and no measure of speed. Scoring the sentence would mean treating a hedged opinion as a firm claim and inventing its scope, which earlier reviews found unfair to him. So I treat it as an opinion that cannot be checked. His description of the cited study is accurate.

Caveats

  • A firmer version, such as 'AI tools slow experienced developers on their own codebases,' could be tested, but he did not state it.

Evidence (1 item)

Claims like this aren’t scored, so there is no evidence to show.

How we judged it

Kind of claim
Observation
Deadline
None given. We don’t add one.

Where we had to interpret

  • The sentence poses a question and answers it with an opinion ("I don't think so"). It is not a firm factual assertion.
  • He supports it by citing a study that 'suggested' a slowdown, which is itself hedged wording.
  • He names no population, tools, task type, period, or measure of speed. Turning this into a test would mean inventing those, which an earlier review found unfair to him.

We don’t grade claims like this. We only check the quote and who said it.

We found 37 claims in this post. See them all.

Full record

Source and dates

Where's Your Ed At, How To Argue With An AI Booster, paragraph 400.

Said
We read the source
live page, full text, public
Evidence up to
Checked

We read this wording on 2026-10-28. The post may have been edited after 2025-08-25.

Where it was said (1)

Said once in the posts we read.

  • : Where's Your Ed At, How To Argue With An AI Booster

    Are AI coding environments making people faster? I don't think so!

    Published
    2025-08-25
    We read it
    , live page
    Access
    full text, public

History

Versions

  • Current: Can’t be checked. Evidence up to 2026-10-28.

What happened to this record

  1. PublishedBy us

    Published after both AI reviews and the final check passed.

  2. Held backBy us

    A reviewer said our test wasn’t fair to what was actually said.