“Big tech has spent over $500 billion in capital expenditures in the last 18 months, and all told — between investments of cloud credits and infrastructure — will likely sink over $600 billion by year's-end.”
Our reading, the sentence that was checked:
Big tech, having spent over $500 billion in capital expenditures in the last 18 months, will likely sink over $600 billion all told, counting investments of cloud credits and infrastructure, by year's end.
Assessment: Can’t be checked Not checked against evidence
Where and when Ed Zitron wrote it
Where's Your Ed At, How To Argue With An AI Booster, paragraph 150.
- Said
- Source observed
- live page, full text, public
- Evidence
- Not checkedboth screens found it cannot be checked
- Assessment recorded
- assessment wyea-how-to-argue-with-an-ai-booster-3be0fb-a1
We recorded 35 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.
The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-28. The source may have been edited after 2025-08-25. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.
What the claim commits to
- Kind
- Forecast
- Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
- “by year's-end”
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Deadline state on 2026-10-29
- No horizon (the release’s reference date)
Conditions
- all told, between investments of cloud credits and infrastructure (scope, stated by the speaker)
- will likely (qualifier, stated by the speaker)
From the speaker
- all told, between investments of cloud credits and infrastructure
- will likely
- by year's-end
- $600 billion
Our interpretation
None added.
This claim is not graded on evidence. The record checks that the words are quoted correctly and attributed to the right person, and that the claim is classified correctly.
Current assessment
Not graded on evidence
Outcome: Can’t be checked
Both AI providers screened this claim on their own and found that public evidence could not settle it. It is recorded and attributed, not scored.
Why it can’t be checked
Both screens gave the same reason:
- Stated as a chance or a possibility, or at medium or low confidence.
- Evidence
- Not checked
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Assessment recorded
- Policy version
- 2026-10-28.7
Rationale
Not checked against evidence. Two independent screens, one from each provider, both found this stated as a chance or a possibility, or at medium or low confidence.
Limitations
None recorded.
Evidence (0 items)
No evidence was searched for. Both screens found that public evidence could not settle this claim.
Where it was said (1)
Said once in the sources this register covers.
: Where's Your Ed At, How To Argue With An AI Booster
Big tech has spent over $500 billion in capital expenditures in the last 18 months, and all told — between investments of cloud credits and infrastructure — will likely sink over $600 billion by year's-end.
- Where
- paragraph 150
- Published
- 2025-08-25
- Source observed
- , live page
- Access
- full text, public
History
Assessment versions
- Assessment wyea-how-to-argue-with-an-ai-booster-3be0fb-a1: Current. Outcome: Can’t be checked. Not checked against evidence. Public date not recorded.
Recorded events
Assessment publishedBy this site
First assessment published after both reviews and the final-text check passed.
About assessment wyea-how-to-argue-with-an-ai-booster-3be0fb-a1.