Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

“Despite its very obvious trust and safety issues, seemingly every major company is trying to cram generative AI into their roadmap.”

Disruption Killed Innovation, paragraph 1.

Our reading:

Seemingly every major company is trying to add generative AI to its roadmap, even though generative AI has obvious trust and safety issues.

Assessment: Supported

What happened

Was it true for the period described?

Outcome: Supported

The evidence matches what they said.

Judged on a plain reading. They named no measure, so we used the reading a typical informed reader would take. It is spelled out under “How we judged it”.

Evidence up to . Checked .

Why

Read plainly, the claim says many major companies were rushing to add generative AI to their products in early 2023, even though the tools had known safety problems. The record backs this. Google announced Bard on Feb 6, 2023 and said it would bring generative AI into its products, starting with Search. Microsoft launched an AI-powered Bing and Edge on Feb 7. Snap launched its My AI chatbot on Feb 27, and Meta set up a top-level generative AI product group the same day. Reuters described a rush by Big Tech companies to put the technology into their products. On safety, CNBC noted well-documented incidents with Bing's chatbot, and Snap itself warned that My AI 'can be tricked into saying just about anything.' 'Seemingly every major company' is an exaggeration and was not tested literally. But the broad wave he described did happen.

Caveats

  • 'Every major company' is hyperbole and cannot be checked literally; the grade rests on a broad wave among the largest tech firms.
  • Evidence covers big tech firms; no comprehensive cross-industry count before the post date was found.
  • Microsoft's primary page shows no date in its text; the date comes from the announcement URL and press coverage.

Evidence (4 items)

  • Supports the claim: Google,

    We’re working to bring these latest AI advancements into our products, starting with Search.

    Why it matters: Google said it would build generative AI models into its products, starting with Search, and announced Bard. This shows a major company putting generative AI on its roadmap.

    Publisher
    Google
    Kind of source
    Company disclosure: the company describing itself, not an independent finding
    About events on
    Published
  • Supports the claim: Microsoft,

    Today, we’re launching an all new, AI-powered Bing search engine and Edge browser, available in preview now at Bing.com, to deliver better search, more complete answers, a new chat experience and the ability to generate content.

    Why it matters: Microsoft built generative chat and content generation into Bing and Edge. This is another major company adding generative AI to core products. The page shows no date; the date comes from the original Feb 7, 2023 announcement URL and press coverage.

    Publisher
    Microsoft
    Kind of source
    Company disclosure: the company describing itself, not an independent finding
    About events on
    Published
  • Supports the claim: CNBC,

    In a nod to well-documented incidents with Bing's OpenAI-based chatbot, Snap warned in a press release that its My AI chatbot "can be tricked into saying just about anything."

    Why it matters: Shows Snap launching a generative AI chatbot while admitting its flaws, and notes documented safety incidents with Bing's chatbot. This backs both the adoption part and the trust and safety part.

    Publisher
    CNBC
    Kind of source
    News report
    About events on
    Published
  • Supports the claim: Reuters (via ThePrint),

    heating up an AI arms race as Big Tech companies rush to integrate the technology into their products and impress investors.

    Why it matters: Reuters reports Meta's new generative AI product group and describes a broad Big Tech rush to integrate the technology into products, which matches the claim.

    Publisher
    Reuters (via ThePrint)
    Kind of source
    News report
    About events on
    Published

How we judged it

Kind of claim
Observation
Deadline
None given. We don’t add one.

Where we had to interpret

  • 'Seemingly every major company' is rhetorical exaggeration. Plain reading: in the weeks before the post, a broad wave of major (mainly tech) companies publicly announced plans or products to build generative AI into their offerings.
  • The claim describes the state of affairs when the post was written. Target period is 2023-01-01 to the post date, 2023-03-06.
  • The trust and safety part is read as: generative AI tools then had publicly known reliability or safety problems (for example misleading or erratic chatbot output) that companies themselves acknowledged.
  • A literal count showing that every single major company did so is not required, and the claim is not contradicted by a few holdouts.

Right if: Several of the largest tech companies (for example Microsoft, Google, Meta, Snap) publicly announced generative AI products or integration plans in early 2023, and there were documented trust and safety problems with these tools at the time.

Wrong if: Few or no major companies announced generative AI integration in early 2023, or the move was limited to one or two isolated firms, or there were no known trust and safety problems with the tools.

We wrote this test after the outcome was known.

We found 7 claims in this post. See them all.

Full record

Source and dates

Where's Your Ed At, Disruption Killed Innovation, paragraph 1.

Said
We read the source
live page, full text, public
Evidence up to
Checked

We read this wording on 2026-10-28. The post may have been edited after 2023-03-06.

Where it was said (1)

Said once in the posts we read.

  • : Where's Your Ed At, Disruption Killed Innovation

    Despite its very obvious trust and safety issues, seemingly every major company is trying to cram generative AI into their roadmap.

    Published
    2023-03-06
    We read it
    , live page
    Access
    full text, public

History

Versions

  • Current: Supported. Evidence up to 2026-10-28.

What happened to this record

  1. PublishedBy us

    Published after both AI reviews and the final check passed.