Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

“At $14 million per megawatt, that works out to around $156.8 billion in annual revenue in GPU rental revenue required to actually make these data centers worth it.”

AI's Economics Don't Make Sense, paragraph 158.

Our reading:

Assuming a PUE of about 1.35 (roughly 11.2GW of critical IT) and $14 million per megawatt, the 15.2GW of data centers under construction need around $156.8 billion in annual GPU rental revenue to be worth it.

Assessment: Can’t be checked

What happened

Not graded on evidence

Outcome: Can’t be checked

An opinion, a recommendation, or too vague to test. Listed, not scored.

Evidence up to . Checked .

Why

The post (28 April 2026) assumes 15.2GW under construction, a PUE of about 1.35 and $14 million per megawatt. From those inputs the arithmetic roughly works: 15.2GW divided by 1.35 is about 11.26GW, and 11.2GW times $14 million per MW is $156.8 billion. The core of the claim is that this revenue is 'required to actually make these data centers worth it.' The passage applies $14 million per MW as annual revenue but gives no basis for that figure. It does not define 'worth it' as payback, profit or covering cost. The packet did not find a source for the 15.2GW input. BloombergNEF (e1) counted about 23.1GW of IT capacity under construction worldwide at the end of September 2025, including 15.9GW in the US. Its scope and date differ from his figure, so it neither confirms nor refutes it. Without a defined standard for 'required,' only the arithmetic can be checked, and the claim cannot be graded.

Caveats

  • The packet did not find the TD Cowen note behind the $14 million per MW figure or the tracker behind the 15.2GW figure.
  • The arithmetic check was done from his stated inputs, not from an outside source.
  • The BloombergNEF count has a different scope and date and cannot test his capacity input.

Evidence (1 item)

Claims like this aren’t scored, so there is no evidence to show.

How we judged it

Kind of claim
Observation
Deadline
None given. We don’t add one.

Conditions

  • 15.2GW under construction (their words)
  • PUE of around 1.35 (their words)
  • $14 million per megawatt (their words)

Where we had to interpret

  • The claim is a calculation built on assumptions he states openly (15.2GW, PUE 1.35, $14M per MW). The arithmetic can be checked. 'Required to make these data centers worth it' is a modelling judgment with no stated basis.
  • Earlier in the post, the $14M per MW figure is a construction cost per MW of data-center capacity. Here it is used as an annual revenue requirement per MW. Nothing in the post explains that step, so the 'required' figure cannot be tested as a fact.
  • If the claim were testable, it would describe the build-out as of the post date, April 2026.

We don’t grade claims like this. We only check the quote and who said it.

We found 34 claims in this post. See them all.

Full record

Source and dates

Where's Your Ed At, AI's Economics Don't Make Sense, paragraph 158.

Said
We read the source
live page, full text, public
Evidence up to
Checked

We read this wording on 2026-10-28. The post may have been edited after 2026-04-28.

Where it was said (1)

Said once in the posts we read.

  • : Where's Your Ed At, AI's Economics Don't Make Sense

    At $14 million per megawatt, that works out to around $156.8 billion in annual revenue in GPU rental revenue required to actually make these data centers worth it.

    Published
    2026-04-28
    We read it
    , live page
    Access
    full text, public

History

Versions

  • Current: Can’t be checked. Evidence up to 2026-10-28.

What happened to this record

  1. PublishedBy us

    Published after both AI reviews and the final check passed.