“Everyone commenting on or thinking about AI should learn it by heart, if not verbatim, certainly the gist.”
Our reading, the sentence that was checked:
Everyone commenting on or thinking about AI should learn by heart, if not word for word then at least the gist, Koopman's point that machine learning trains on many examples and, when it meets something it lacks many examples of, may have no idea what is going on.
Assessment: Can’t be checked Not checked against evidence
Where and when Gary Marcus wrote it
Marcus on AI, This one important fact about current AI explains almost everything, paragraph 13.
- Said
- Source observed
- live page, full text, public
- Evidence
- Not checkedboth screens found it cannot be checked
- Assessment recorded
- assessment marcus-this-one-important-fact-about-current-ad786f-a1
We recorded 5 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.
The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-28. The source may have been edited after 2024-08-01. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.
What the claim commits to
- Kind
- Recommendation or value judgment
- Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
- None stated. This site does not add one.
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Deadline state on 2026-10-29
- No horizon (the release’s reference date)
Conditions
- everyone commenting on or thinking about AI (scope, stated by the speaker)
- if not verbatim, certainly the gist (qualifier, stated by the speaker)
From the speaker
- everyone commenting on or thinking about AI
- if not verbatim, certainly the gist
Our interpretation
None added.
This claim is not graded on evidence. The record checks that the words are quoted correctly and attributed to the right person, and that the claim is classified correctly.
Current assessment
Not graded on evidence
Outcome: Can’t be checked
Both AI providers screened this claim on their own and found that public evidence could not settle it. It is recorded and attributed, not scored.
Why it can’t be checked
Both screens gave the same reason:
- A recommendation or a value judgment.
- Evidence
- Not checked
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Assessment recorded
- Policy version
- 2026-10-28.7
Rationale
Not checked against evidence. Two independent screens, one from each provider, both found this a recommendation or a value judgment.
Limitations
None recorded.
Evidence (0 items)
No evidence was searched for. Both screens found that public evidence could not settle this claim.
Where it was said (1)
Said once in the sources this register covers.
: Marcus on AI, This one important fact about current AI explains almost everything
Everyone commenting on or thinking about AI should learn it by heart, if not verbatim, certainly the gist.
- Where
- paragraph 13
- Published
- 2024-08-01
- Source observed
- , live page
- Access
- full text, public
History
Assessment versions
- Assessment marcus-this-one-important-fact-about-current-ad786f-a1: Current. Outcome: Can’t be checked. Not checked against evidence. Public date not recorded.
Recorded events
Assessment publishedBy this site
First assessment published after both reviews and the final-text check passed.
About assessment marcus-this-one-important-fact-about-current-ad786f-a1.