Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

“I will give the last word to Filip Piekniewski, who did the right test: try something that isn’t in the vast corpus, that requires real reasoning, and see how it runs…”

The truth about Google’s amazing new demo, paragraph 11. The full statement is at the source.

Our reading, the sentence that was checked:

Filip Piekniewski's test of Gemini, which tried something not in the vast training corpus that requires real reasoning and checked how it ran, was the right test.

Assessment: Can’t be checked Not checked against evidence

Where and when Gary Marcus wrote it

Marcus on AI, The truth about Google’s amazing new demo, paragraph 11.

Said
Source observed
live page, full text, public
Evidence
Not checkedboth screens found it cannot be checked
Assessment recorded
assessment marcus-the-truth-about-googles-amazing-new-1bc3bb-a1

We recorded 6 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.

The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-29. The source may have been edited after 2023-12-07. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.

What the claim commits to

Kind
Recommendation or value judgment
Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
None stated. This site does not add one.
Deadline state when assessed
No horizon
Deadline state on 2026-10-29
No horizon (the release’s reference date)

Conditions

  • Piekniewski's particular test of Gemini (scope, stated by the speaker)

From the speaker

  • Piekniewski's particular test of Gemini

Our interpretation

None added.

This claim is not graded on evidence. The record checks that the words are quoted correctly and attributed to the right person, and that the claim is classified correctly.

Current assessment

Not graded on evidence

Outcome: Can’t be checked

Both AI providers screened this claim on their own and found that public evidence could not settle it. It is recorded and attributed, not scored.

Why it can’t be checked

Both screens gave the same reason:

  • A recommendation or a value judgment.
Evidence
Not checked
Deadline state when assessed
No horizon
Assessment recorded
Policy version
2026-10-28.7

Rationale

Not checked against evidence. Two independent screens, one from each provider, both found this a recommendation or a value judgment.

Limitations

None recorded.

Evidence (0 items)

No evidence was searched for. Both screens found that public evidence could not settle this claim.

Where it was said (1)

Said once in the sources this register covers.

  • : Marcus on AI, The truth about Google’s amazing new demo

    I will give the last word to Filip Piekniewski, who did the right test: try something that isn’t in the vast corpus, that requires real reasoning, and see how it runs…

    Published
    2023-12-07
    Source observed
    , live page
    Access
    full text, public

History

Assessment versions

Recorded events

  1. Assessment publishedBy this site

    First assessment published after both reviews and the final-text check passed.

    About assessment marcus-the-truth-about-googles-amazing-new-1bc3bb-a1.