“Taking the SalesForce report together with the Apple paper, it’s clear the current tech is not to be trusted.”
Our reading, the sentence that was checked:
Taking the Salesforce report together with the Apple paper, it is clear that the current tech is not to be trusted.
Assessment: Can’t be checked Not checked against evidence
Where and when Gary Marcus wrote it
Marcus on AI, Seven replies to the viral Apple reasoning paper – and why they fall short, paragraph 16.
- Said
- Source observed
- live page, full text, public
- Evidence
- Not checkedboth screens found it cannot be checked
- Assessment recorded
- assessment marcus-seven-replies-to-the-viral-apple-e04f47-a1
We recorded 13 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.
The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-28. The source may have been edited after 2025-06-12. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.
What the claim commits to
- Kind
- Recommendation or value judgment
- Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
- None stated. This site does not add one.
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Deadline state on 2026-10-29
- No horizon (the release’s reference date)
Conditions
- taking the Salesforce report together with the Apple paper (qualifier, stated by the speaker)
From the speaker
- taking the Salesforce report together with the Apple paper
Our interpretation
None added.
This claim is not graded on evidence. The record checks that the words are quoted correctly and attributed to the right person, and that the claim is classified correctly.
Current assessment
Not graded on evidence
Outcome: Can’t be checked
Both AI providers screened this claim on their own and found that public evidence could not settle it. It is recorded and attributed, not scored.
Why it can’t be checked
Both screens gave the same reason:
- A recommendation or a value judgment.
- Evidence
- Not checked
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Assessment recorded
- Policy version
- 2026-10-28.7
Rationale
Not checked against evidence. Two independent screens, one from each provider, both found this a recommendation or a value judgment.
Limitations
None recorded.
Evidence (0 items)
No evidence was searched for. Both screens found that public evidence could not settle this claim.
Where it was said (1)
Said once in the sources this register covers.
: Marcus on AI, Seven replies to the viral Apple reasoning paper – and why they fall short
Taking the SalesForce report together with the Apple paper, it’s clear the current tech is not to be trusted.
- Where
- paragraph 16
- Published
- 2025-06-12
- Source observed
- , live page
- Access
- full text, public
History
Assessment versions
- Assessment marcus-seven-replies-to-the-viral-apple-e04f47-a1: Current. Outcome: Can’t be checked. Not checked against evidence. Public date not recorded.