“None of which means we are close to AGI. There are many ways to put together symbols and neural nets. I am not at all convinced we have the right one.”
Our reading, the sentence that was checked:
These results do not mean we are close to AGI, and Marcus is not at all convinced the field has found the right way to combine symbols and neural nets.
Assessment: Can’t be checked Not checked against evidence
Where and when Gary Marcus wrote it
Marcus on AI, How o3 and Grok 4 Accidentally Vindicated Neurosymbolic AI, paragraph 106.
- Said
- Source observed
- live page, full text, public
- Evidence
- Not checkedboth screens found it cannot be checked
- Assessment recorded
- assessment marcus-how-o3-and-grok-4-accidentally-vindicated-63059a-a1
We recorded 36 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.
The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-28. The source may have been edited after 2025-07-13. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.
What the claim commits to
- Kind
- Observation
- Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
- None stated. This site does not add one.
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Deadline state on 2026-10-29
- No horizon (the release’s reference date)
Conditions
- there are many ways to put together symbols and neural nets (qualifier, stated by the speaker)
From the speaker
- there are many ways to put together symbols and neural nets
Our interpretation
None added.
This claim is not graded on evidence. The record checks that the words are quoted correctly and attributed to the right person, and that the claim is classified correctly.
Current assessment
Not graded on evidence
Outcome: Can’t be checked
Both AI providers screened this claim on their own and found that public evidence could not settle it. It is recorded and attributed, not scored.
Why it can’t be checked
Each screen gave its own reason:
- Too vague to test: informed readers would test it in different ways and reach different answers.
- About something no public evidence could show, such as a private intention or a counterfactual.
- Evidence
- Not checked
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Assessment recorded
- Policy version
- 2026-10-28.7
Rationale
Not checked against evidence. Two independent screens, one from each provider, both found that evidence could not settle it: one found it too vague to test: informed readers would test it in different ways and reach different answers; the other found it about something no public evidence could show, such as a private intention or a counterfactual.
Limitations
None recorded.
Evidence (0 items)
No evidence was searched for. Both screens found that public evidence could not settle this claim.
Where it was said (1)
Said once in the sources this register covers.
: Marcus on AI, How o3 and Grok 4 Accidentally Vindicated Neurosymbolic AI
None of which means we are close to AGI. There are many ways to put together symbols and neural nets. I am not at all convinced we have the right one.
- Where
- paragraph 106
- Published
- 2025-07-13
- Source observed
- , live page
- Access
- full text, public
History
Assessment versions
- Assessment marcus-how-o3-and-grok-4-accidentally-vindicated-63059a-a1: Current. Outcome: Can’t be checked. Not checked against evidence. Public date not recorded.
Recorded events
Assessment publishedBy this site
First assessment published after both reviews and the final-text check passed.
About assessment marcus-how-o3-and-grok-4-accidentally-vindicated-63059a-a1.