“If you want to know what a large cross section of the field’s leaders are thinking, right now, there’s no better place to start, a time capsule of 2022 as we enter into the remaining wild AI years of the 2020s.”
Our reading, the sentence that was checked:
The remaining years of the 2020s will be wild for AI.
Assessment: Can’t be checked Not checked against evidence
Where and when Gary Marcus wrote it
Marcus on AI, An epic AI Debate—and why everyone should be at least a little bit worried about AI going into 2023, paragraph 23.
- Said
- Source observed
- live page, full text, public
- Evidence
- Not checkedboth screens found it cannot be checked
- Assessment recorded
- assessment marcus-an-epic-ai-debateand-why-everyone-68bc3b-a1
We recorded 7 claims from this post. See every claim from this post.
The wording above is the version this site observed on 2026-10-29. The source may have been edited after 2022-12-31. This page does not claim the wording was captured then.
What the claim commits to
- Kind
- Rhetoric
- Deadline, as the speaker wrote it
- “the remaining wild AI years of the 2020s”
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Deadline state on 2026-10-29
- No horizon (the release’s reference date)
From the speaker
- the remaining wild AI years of the 2020s
Our interpretation
None added.
This claim is not graded on evidence. The record checks that the words are quoted correctly and attributed to the right person, and that the claim is classified correctly.
Current assessment
Not graded on evidence
Outcome: Can’t be checked
Both AI providers screened this claim on their own and found that public evidence could not settle it. It is recorded and attributed, not scored.
Why it can’t be checked
Both screens gave the same reason:
- Rhetoric that commits to nothing testable.
- Evidence
- Not checked
- Deadline state when assessed
- No horizon
- Assessment recorded
- Policy version
- 2026-10-28.7
Rationale
Not checked against evidence. Two independent screens, one from each provider, both found this rhetoric that commits to nothing testable.
Limitations
None recorded.
Evidence (0 items)
No evidence was searched for. Both screens found that public evidence could not settle this claim.
Where it was said (1)
Said once in the sources this register covers.
: Marcus on AI, An epic AI Debate—and why everyone should be at least a little bit worried about AI going into 2023
If you want to know what a large cross section of the field’s leaders are thinking, right now, there’s no better place to start, a time capsule of 2022 as we enter into the remaining wild AI years of the 2020s.
- Where
- paragraph 23
- Published
- 2022-12-31
- Source observed
- , live page
- Access
- full text, public
History
Assessment versions
- Assessment marcus-an-epic-ai-debateand-why-everyone-68bc3b-a1: Current. Outcome: Can’t be checked. Not checked against evidence. Public date not recorded.
Recorded events
Assessment publishedBy this site
First assessment published after both reviews and the final-text check passed.
About assessment marcus-an-epic-ai-debateand-why-everyone-68bc3b-a1.