Rabbit Holed
We recorded 5 claims from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 4 can’t be checked. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (5)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“Though I am not a tax attorney or an accountant, nor do I have any insight beyond what’s publicly available, this highly suggests that Rabbit Inc cannot currently do business in the State of California, where it is headquartered.”
Our reading: Rabbit Inc.'s forfeited status strongly suggests it cannot currently do business in California, where it is headquartered.
No horizon
Qualifier: based on forfeited status with California Secretary of State
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“At the very least, Jesse Lyu should comprehensively explain what has happened here and be honest and forthright with his explanations.”
Our reading: Rabbit CEO Jesse Lyu should give a full, honest explanation of what happened with GAMA and Cyber Manufacture.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“I also want Lyu to apologize to anyone who invested in GAMA, and the multiple people he has attempted to gaslight by suggesting he had no relationship with the company.”
Our reading: Zitron wants Jesse Lyu to apologize to anyone who invested in GAMA and to the multiple people Lyu has attempted to gaslight by suggesting he had no relationship with the company.
No horizon
Assessment: UnresolvedSaid
Observation
“Lyu — and, for that matter, Rabbit/Cyber Manufacture Co. — has failed to be transparent with its customers, the press, and the public writ large. And yet he demands an unbelievable amount of faith from users of the Rabbit R1, who must provide their usernames and passwords for any service they wish to connect to the device by remotely connecting into a virtual machine and typing them.”
Our reading: Lyu and Rabbit have not been transparent, yet R1 users must hand over usernames and passwords for connected services through a remote virtual machine.
No horizon Evidence as of
Limitation: The transparency language is partly evaluative.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“I also believe that Jesse Lyu owes reporters he has talked to and users that have paid him money thorough explanations as to what happened to his previous ventures, what happened to the funds raised by said ventures, and why he has so thoroughly sought to obfuscate their existence.”
Our reading: Zitron believes Jesse Lyu owes the reporters he has talked to and the users who have paid him money thorough explanations of what happened to his previous ventures, what happened to the funds those ventures raised, and why he has so thoroughly sought to obfuscate their existence.
No horizon
Qualifier: I also believe