Exclusive: Here's How Much OpenAI Spends On Inference and Its Revenue Share With Microsoft
We recorded 3 claims from this post. 3 can’t be checked. 2 more are held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (3)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“Based on the information in this piece, OpenAI’s costs and revenues are potentially dramatically different to what we believed.”
Our reading: OpenAI's costs and revenues are potentially dramatically different from what was publicly believed.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“Based on these numbers, it appears that OpenAI may be the single-most cash intensive startup of all time, and that the cost of running large language models may not be something that can be supported by revenues.”
Our reading: OpenAI may be the most cash-intensive startup of all time.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“Based on these numbers, it appears that OpenAI may be the single-most cash intensive startup of all time, and that the cost of running large language models may not be something that can be supported by revenues.”
Our reading: The cost of running large language models may not be supportable by revenues.
No horizon
Held from this post (2)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- The two reviews reached different assessments. Our reading, not assessed: Zitron cannot see a path for OpenAI to hit its projected $13 billion in revenue by the end of 2025, nor any basis for Sam Altman's statement that OpenAI will make 'well more' than $13 billion this year.
- The two reviews read the claim differently