Never Forget What They've Done
We recorded 2 claims from this post. 2 can’t be checked. 7 more are held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (2)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“The App Store is an abomination, your iPhone settings look like a fucking Escher painting, and in its desperation to follow the pack it shoved Apple Intelligence out the door — one of the most invasive and annoying pieces of software to ever grace a computer.”
Our reading: In its desperation to follow the pack, Apple shoved Apple Intelligence out the door, and it is one of the most invasive and annoying pieces of software ever to grace a computer.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“There is nothing about an LLM that feels like it’s built to provide a real service, other than some sort-of fraudulent copy of something else lacking its soul or utility.”
Our reading: Nothing about an LLM feels like it is built to provide a real service, other than as some sort-of fraudulent copy of something else that lacks that thing's soul or utility.
No horizon
Qualifier: feels like
Held from this post (7)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- The two reviews read the claim differently
- The criteria are ambiguous. Our reading, not assessed: LLMs could generate a lot of text or pictures, which barely approximated anything society wanted or needed, other than being something people used to be willing to pay more for.
- The criteria are ambiguous. Our reading, not assessed: Sam Altman's and Satya Nadella's push for LLMs has filled the internet with junk and made online information worse.
- The two reviews read the claim differently
- The two reviews read the claim differently
- The two reviews read the claim differently
- The two reviews read the claim differently