Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

Managing Up

We recorded 3 claims from this post. 3 can’t be checked. 2 more are held. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (3)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Rhetoric

    “Much like ChatGPT, Altman is capable only of loosely approximating the output requested, because at his core he lacks any of the substance or technical history required to do so.”

    Our reading: ChatGPT, like Sam Altman, can only loosely approximate the output requested of it.

    No horizon

  2. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Conditional forecast

    “If left unchecked, OpenAI will perpetuate one of the largest thefts in history, looting the internet and using it to train models that have yet to prove their necessity other than as a symbol that Silicon Valley can still innovate.”

    Our reading: If left unchecked, OpenAI will perpetuate one of the largest thefts in history by looting the internet and using it to train models that have yet to prove their necessity other than as a symbol that Silicon Valley can still innovate.

    No horizon

    Only if: if OpenAI is left unchecked

  3. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Causal claim

    “Yet because Altman — like every manager — is so thoroughly divorced from actual production, he’s only succeeded in generating unsustainable hype and making vague promises that the people who do the actual work at OpenAI likely know they can’t keep.”

    Our reading: Because he is divorced from actual production, Altman has only generated unsustainable AI hype and vague promises that OpenAI's workers likely know cannot be kept.

    No horizon

Held from this post (2)

These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.