US AI policy is a clumsy mess. Here’s what to do about it.
We recorded 3 claims from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 2 can’t be checked. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (3)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“That’s not good for anyone, businesses or consumers.”
Our reading: The situation of many US AI bills without anything that feels like a coherent AI policy is not good for anyone, businesses or consumers.
No horizon
Scope: anyone, businesses or consumers
Assessment: SupportedSaid
Observation
“The US has 1,200 AI bills (roughly 150 enacted into law), but nothing that feels like a coherent AI policy.”
Our reading: The US has 1,200 AI bills, roughly 150 of them enacted into law, but nothing that feels like a coherent AI policy.
No horizon Evidence as of
Limitation: The verdict depends on reading the abbreviated post with its linked context.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Forecast
“Might sound nerdy, but the alternative, to which we are headed, is poorly considered chaos.”
Our reading: Without a coherent framework, US AI policy is headed toward poorly considered chaos.
No horizon
Qualifier: without a coherent framework for AI legislation