Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

Two kinds of Techno-Optimism

We recorded 3 claims from this post. 3 can’t be checked. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (3)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Recommendation or value judgment

    “But being long-term optimistic about technology doesn't mean you have to ignore the short-term (or long-term) risks of technology.”

    Our reading: Being long-term optimistic about technology does not mean one has to ignore the short-term or long-term risks of technology.

    No horizon

    Scope: for someone who is long-term optimistic about technology

  2. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Recommendation or value judgment

    “It's mean *working* for a positive future, not just declaring that one is inevitable and hoping for the best.”

    Our reading: A positive technological future has to be actively worked for, not just declared inevitable while hoping for the best.

    No horizon

  3. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    Recommendation or value judgment

    “It means working to recognize the risks, and working to address them, so that we can reach the positive outcomes that are promised, not casting those who recognize those risks as the enemy.”

    Our reading: Techno-optimists should work to recognize and address technology's risks to reach its promised benefits, rather than treating people who point out those risks as enemies.

    No horizon