Things are so desperate at OpenAI that Sam Altman is starting to sound like Gary Marcus
We recorded 2 claims from this post. 2 were checked against evidence. 7 more are held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (2)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: UnresolvedSaid
“And no other form of deep learning has yet solved the issues of reasoning, hallucinations, stupid errors, and factuality, either.”
What we tested: No form of deep learning has yet solved reasoning, hallucinations, stupid errors, or factuality.
Assessment: UnresolvedSaid
“The dynamic with Altman is slightly different; it’s not that his lead is gone, but that his lead (and his reputation) has dwindled, after the disappointment of GPT-5.”
What we tested: After GPT-5's disappointment, OpenAI's lead and Altman's reputation have dwindled, though the lead is not gone.
Held from this post (7)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- The two reviews read the claim differently
- The two reviews read the claim differently
- The two reviews read the claim differently
- The two reviews read the claim differently
- The two reviews reached different assessments. Our reading, not assessed: GPT-5 was finally released, and it was an immense disappointment.
- The two reviews reached different assessments. Our reading, not assessed: Last week Altman said nobody really knew what AGI was anyway, which in Marcus's reading implicitly acknowledged that AGI might not be so close after all and downplayed the goal of AGI altogether.
- The two reviews read the claim differently