The need for a President that speaks AI natively
We recorded 8 claims from this post. 8 can’t be checked. 2 more are held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (8)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“the whole Generative AI thing is looking more and more like a dud.”
Our reading: The whole generative AI thing is looking more and more like a dud.
No horizon
Qualifier: more and more (increasing trend)
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“We do need new approaches to AI.”
Our reading: New approaches to AI are needed.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Forecast
“OpenAI may in fact yet turn out to be the WeWork of AI.”
Our reading: OpenAI may yet turn out to be the WeWork of AI.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Forecast
“AI is going to change everything, if not tomorrow, sometime over the next 5-20 years, some ways for good, some for bad.”
Our reading: AI will change everything, for good and bad, sometime within the next 5 to 20 years.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“We cannot afford to have a President in 2024 that doesn’t fully grasp this.”
Our reading: The US must elect a President in 2024 who fully grasps AI's transformative impact.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“And we need a President who can get Congress (which has this far dithered) to recognize the true urgency of the moment, since Executive Orders alone are not enough.”
Our reading: We need a President who can get Congress, which has thus far dithered, to recognize the true urgency of the moment on AI, since executive orders alone are not enough.
No horizon
Scope: in the context of US AI policy
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“We need a President who can recognize when corporate leaders are promising things far beyond is currently realistic, who can sort truth from bullshit, in order to develop AI policies that are grounded in reality.”
Our reading: The US needs a President who can tell when corporate AI promises are unrealistic, so that AI policy is grounded in reality.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“We also need a President who can stand up to big tech, and resist regulatory capture.”
Our reading: The US needs a President who stands up to big tech and resists regulatory capture.
No horizon
Held from this post (2)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- The two reviews reached different assessments. Our reading, not assessed: Altman offhandedly told the Aspen audience that AI could double the world's GDP, without offering a shred of evidence.
- The two reviews read the claim differently