The dirty underbelly of AI
We recorded 1 claim from this post. 1 can’t be checked. 2 more are held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (1)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“But here’s someone else the AI industry is taking advantage of: you.”
Our reading: The AI industry is taking advantage of ordinary people, in this context through harvesting their personal data.
No horizon
Scope: in the context of collecting personal data (Meta, Google, Zoom, carmakers)
Held from this post (2)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- The criteria are ambiguous. Our reading, not assessed: The current AI paradigm needs so much data that the entire public internet does not seem to be enough.
- The criteria are ambiguous. Our reading, not assessed: An AI paradigm that could learn much of what it needed to be effective in the world without going through all of a person's personal data is imaginable but does not yet exist.