The AI trial of the century ends with a whimper
We recorded 1 claim from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 1 more is held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (1)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: SupportedSaid
“The AI trial of the century has just ended with a procedural whimper rather a bang; the jury agreed that Musk was too late but never weighed in on the questions of whether OpenAI did was legitimate.”
What we tested: The Musk v. OpenAI trial ended on procedural grounds: the jury found Musk's claim too late and did not rule on whether OpenAI's conduct was legitimate.
What happened: Directly supports the claim that the jury found Musk too late. This independent report agrees with the court minutes consulted. (KQED, )
Held from this post (1)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.