Some things @GaryMarcus might say
We recorded 2 claims from this post. 2 can’t be checked. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (2)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“Marcus would, I daresay, not disagree with a single word.”
Our reading: Marcus, writing about himself in the third person, says he daresays he would not disagree with a single word of the LeCun tweets quoted just before this line.
No horizon
Scope: the LeCun tweets quoted earlier in the post
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“Marcus and LeCun would also agree that Cicero, which has received far less attention, deserves more, in part because of its capacity for planning:”
Our reading: Meta's Cicero deserves more attention than it has received, in part because it can plan.
No horizon