Shame on Google, twice
We recorded 1 claim from this post. 1 can’t be checked. 1 more is held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (1)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Rhetoric
“So much for exponential progress.”
Our reading: Google repeating the same kind of LLM error two years apart mocks claims of exponential progress in AI.
No horizon
Qualifier: sarcastic remark
Held from this post (1)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- The two reviews reached different assessments. Our reading, not assessed: In February 2025 Google again showcased an LLM output that contained a hallucinated error, repeating its February 2023 mistake.