Self-modern, post-parody
We recorded 3 claims from this post. 3 can’t be checked. 3 more are held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (3)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“And when it is not satirizing itself, big tech is regularly and predictably falling on its face, the same way, over and over again, with ever larger amounts of money.”
Our reading: Big tech AI efforts are regularly and predictably failing in the same way, with ever larger amounts of money spent.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“Consumers are starting to catch on:”
Our reading: Consumers are starting to catch on, apparently to the AI failures and hype the post has just described, though the post does not say exactly what they are catching on to.
No horizon
Qualifier: starting to (early stage, not widespread)
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Forecast
“in which I argued for the more optimistic view on AI (viz., that even in the worst case it probably won’t lead to every single human on the planet dying).”
Our reading: Even in the worst case, AI probably will not lead to every human on the planet dying.
No horizon
Qualifier: even in the worst case
Held from this post (3)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- The two reviews reached different assessments. Our reading, not assessed: The massive Behemoth model has so far not been working.
- The record does not meet the current rules. Our reading, not assessed: OpenAI has never turned a profit.
- Attribution is uncertain