ScarJo is just the tip of the iceberg
We recorded 3 claims from this post. 3 can’t be checked. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (3)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“Instead, they appear to be focused precisely on financial return, and appear almost indifferent to some the ways in which their product has already hurt large numbers of people (artists, writers, voiceover actors, etc).”
Our reading: OpenAI appears to be focused precisely on financial return and appears almost indifferent to some of the ways its product has already hurt large numbers of people, such as artists, writers and voiceover actors.
No horizon
Qualifier: appear(s)
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“The real issue isn’t whether OpenAI would win in court, it’s what happens to all of us, if a company with a track record for cutting ethical corners winds up first to AGI.”
Our reading: The real issue is not whether OpenAI would win in court but what happens to all of us if a company with a track record for cutting ethical corners ends up first to AGI.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“And that we don’t leave our collective future entirely to self-regulation.”
Our reading: Society should not leave AI's future entirely to industry self-regulation.
No horizon