Sam Altman’s attitude problem
We recorded 2 claims from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 1 can’t be checked. 2 more are held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (2)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“As I have argued here before, Sam Altman is, despite outward appearances, not a nice fellow.”
Our reading: Sam Altman, despite outward appearances, is not a nice person.
No horizon
Qualifier: despite outward appearances
Assessment: SupportedSaid
Observation
“It certainly took zero responsibility for what appears to be an obvious infringement.”
Our reading: Sam Altman's response at TED took no responsibility for what appears to be an obvious copyright infringement by an OpenAI system.
No horizon Evidence as of
Limitation: The finding concerns the content of the reply, not the legality of the image.
Held from this post (2)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- The two reviews read the claim differently
- The criteria are ambiguous. Our reading, not assessed: An OpenAI system generated what appeared to be a presumably unlicensed Peanuts cartoon.