OpenAI Cries Foul
We recorded 3 claims from this post. 3 can’t be checked. 1 more is held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (3)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“This seems plausible. DeepSeek may well have broken OpenAI’s Terms of Service and distilled1 their intellectual property without permission.”
Our reading: It is plausible that DeepSeek broke OpenAI's Terms of Service by distilling OpenAI's models without permission.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“OpenAI may well have done analogous things to YouTube, New York Times, and countless artists and writers.”
Our reading: OpenAI may well have used content from YouTube, the New York Times, and many artists and writers without permission, much as DeepSeek allegedly did to OpenAI.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Rhetoric
“Karma is a bitch.”
Our reading: OpenAI being copied by DeepSeek is karmic payback for its own use of others' IP.
No horizon
Held from this post (1)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.