Most people don’t think GenAI has improved their productivity
We recorded 2 claims from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 1 can’t be checked. 1 more is held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (2)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“Incredibly damning new study on GenAI from the Upwork Research Institute, via Baldur Bjarnason (whose wonderful essay on LLMs and how they fool the gullible I discussed in April).”
Our reading: The new Upwork Research Institute study on generative AI is incredibly damning.
No horizon
Qualifier: via Baldur Bjarnason
Assessment: UnresolvedSaid
Observation
“PS Microsoft Bing completely flubbed, 4/4, “people going yuck towards Generative AI”.”
Our reading: Microsoft Bing completely flubbed the prompt "people going yuck towards Generative AI", 4 out of 4 results.
No horizon Evidence as of
Limitation: Only one search query was run, so an independent record could still exist that this search missed.
Held from this post (1)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- The two reviews reached different assessments. Our reading, not assessed: Outside coders and tech fans, many workers do not view ChatGPT favourably as a work tool.