Massive scoop
We recorded 2 claims from this post. 2 can’t be checked. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (2)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“This is inconsistent with all narratives about “cloddish” or self-interested boards, and suggests that something real happened.”
Our reading: The reported concessions by Sam Altman and Greg Brockman (giving up board seats, agreeing to an internal investigation) are inconsistent with narratives that the OpenAI board was cloddish or self-interested.
No horizon
Qualifier: given reports that Sam and Greg gave up board seats and Sam agreed to an internal investigation
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Observation
“This is inconsistent with all narratives about “cloddish” or self-interested boards, and suggests that something real happened.”
Our reading: Sam Altman and Greg Brockman giving up their board seats, and Altman agreeing to an internal investigation, are inconsistent with all narratives of a 'cloddish' or self-interested OpenAI board, and suggest that something real happened.
No horizon
Qualifier: based on The Information's report that Sam and Greg gave up their board seats and Sam agreed to an internal investigation