Hype, Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, the podcasters who love him — and how the New York Times’ commentary on AI has degenerated into industry cheerleading
We recorded 3 claims from this post. 3 can’t be checked. 4 more are held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (3)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Forecast
“I stressed, for example, there would likely be an ongoing need to have humans to debug, maintain and systems.”
Our reading: There would likely be an ongoing need for humans to debug and maintain systems.
No horizon
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“As I explained, Amodei’s coding claims seemed outright fanciful to me.”
Our reading: Amodei's coding claims seemed outright fanciful to Marcus.
No horizon
Qualifier: seemed ... to me
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Recommendation or value judgment
“Anthropic needs to answer some hard questions here.”
Our reading: Anthropic should answer hard questions about the gap between its claims about AI coding and its hiring of coders.
No horizon
Held from this post (4)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- The two reviews reached different assessments. Our reading, not assessed: AGI will not arrive in 2025.
- The two reviews read the claim differently
- The two reviews reached different assessments. Our reading, not assessed: Dario Amodei has quietly slipped his AGI predictions back, so that he now mostly talks about 2026-2027 rather than 2025-2026.
- The two reviews read the claim differently