ChatGPT Blows Mapmaking 101
We recorded 2 claims from this post. 2 can’t be checked. 2 more are held. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (2)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Conditional forecast
“It is a fantasy to think that we can get to safe AI without addressing the problem head on.”
Our reading: Safe AI cannot be achieved unless the reliability/instruction-following problem is addressed directly.
No horizon
Only if: without directly addressing the instruction-following reliability problem
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Causal claim
“Gary Marcus is certain that neurosymbolic AI can help.”
Our reading: Neurosymbolic AI can help address the reliability problems of current models.
No horizon Evidence as of
Limitation: No evidence was used in this assessment. The two sources considered were not relied on, and the result does not depend on their findings.
Held from this post (2)
These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.
- Attribution is uncertain
- The criteria are ambiguous. Our reading, not assessed: Newer models' ability to reliably follow instructions still seems lacking.