As the OpenAI World Turns: 4 vital questions
We recorded 2 claims from this post. 1 was checked against evidence. 1 can’t be checked. Read the post at its source.
Claims from this post (2)
In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.
Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid
Forecast
“They may well get their way.”
Our reading: OpenAI's investors may well succeed in getting the board to resign and bringing Sam Altman back.
No horizon
Assessment: SupportedSaid
Observation
“We pretty obviously don’t have a say.”
Our reading: The public has no say in how OpenAI's governance crisis is resolved, including its implications for safety and humanity.
No horizon Evidence as of
Limitation: The result depends on interpreting “a say” as formal participation.