Pundit ClaimsAI claims by Gary Marcus and Ed Zitron, with the evidence

Agents and ROI

We recorded 1 claim from this post. 1 can’t be checked. 1 more is held. Read the post at its source.

Claims from this post (1)

In the order they appear in the post. Each quotation is the speaker’s words in this post. A label such as “Supported” or “Can’t be checked” is the claim’s current assessment; its page has the evidence and the reasons.

  1. Assessment: Can’t be checkedSaid

    “The situation for agents thus far looks to be similar: lots of hype; not so much ROI:”

    What we tested: So far, AI agents appear to have lots of hype but little return on investment, as with generative AI generally.

Held from this post (1)

These records did not pass every check, so nothing about them is published. Held is not a finding.

  • The AIs reached different verdicts. Our reading, not assessed: An MIT study and six or seven later studies have shown that generative AI has not delivered real ROI for most businesses.